Brand directory
Browse US restaurant nutrition by menu, rather than treating unlike servings as interchangeable. Two brands have live calculators and source-linked guides. The rest are in research, with no empty menu pages to send you to.
Starbucks currently has 262 US ready-to-eat menu items in our index: 189 beverages and 73 foods across 686 listed sizes. The restaurant nutrition data was retrieved 2026-09-28. The calculator compares standard drink sizes and a limited set of labeled customization estimates; the nutrition guide covers food as well. Dedicated lists also help you compare lower-calorie drinks and drinks with 0 g published total sugar without changing the original recipe.
Dunkin currently has 438 published US recipe entries and 993 serving rows in our guide. These include coffee with different milk, sugar and flavor combinations, plus breakfast food and donuts. Its restaurant nutrition source is Dunkin’s PDF, revised 2026-08-19 and retrieved 2026-09-28. The calculator can add listed food and drink servings into one order. The PDF does not publish caffeine, so that field stays unavailable instead of being inferred from drink size.
The wider library
These are future menu categories, not live calculators. The restaurant nutrition research queue begins with Chipotle, Subway and Taco Bell, followed by Chick-fil-A, Panera, In-N-Out, Dutch Bros, Wendy’s, McDonald’s and Shake Shack. KFC, Burger King and Pizza Hut remain on the broader research list. This is a working order, not a promised launch date. Each brand needs checked official data and a calculator that fits how that menu is ordered.
Choose the right page
Start with a restaurant nutrition calculator when you already know the chain and want to check one drink or assemble an order. Select the exact product and listed serving before reading the result. Starbucks currently allows an estimated extra espresso shot for supported drinks and estimated regular vanilla syrup pump changes where the published recipe specifies a starting count. Dunkin instead lets you choose from published whole recipes, then combine their servings. Its milk and flavor variations are separate records, so choosing the closest listed recipe is more reliable than pretending every ingredient can be changed independently.
Start with a restaurant nutrition facts guide when you are comparing alternatives. The Starbucks table includes drinks and foods by size, with calories, sugar and caffeine where available. The Dunkin table has every imported serving row from its official PDF, including regional and limited-time entries that may not be sold at your store. You can read both tables in the original page HTML without running JavaScript; search and sorting only make browsing easier. For a shorter question, the Starbucks lists isolate standard drinks at 100 calories or less and drinks recorded with 0 g total sugar.
What the numbers mean
Restaurant names identify the menus being compared; this is an independent site, not an official tool from any chain. Restaurant nutrition records for Starbucks link to product pages and identify two promotional drinks whose calorie values are explicitly estimated because their full nutrition panels are unavailable. Dunkin records retain the nutrition PDF page and revision information. Plain-tea calories are approximate where the PDF describes them as nutritionally insignificant, while unreported nutrients remain unavailable. Menu availability and recipe preparation can differ by location.
We check restaurant nutrition source changes weekly, review candidate updates and show retrieval or revision dates on the relevant pages. A new restaurant will not appear merely because its name is popular: we need a complete menu source, clear serving definitions and a calculation model suited to the food. Chipotle will need ingredient combinations; Subway will need bread, size and toppings; burger and chicken chains need an order model; pizza needs whole-pie and slice distinctions. The data and calculation method explains how published values, estimates and missing fields are handled.